Assumptions, Assumptions and More Assumptions

To Ms. Harding ( a response to this posting http://costellogarbage.blogspot.com/2009/04/secret-agent-man.html )

Ohhhh, great investigation Saxon.


Who would have ever thought that Coach and Coach14 might be the same person. Duhhhhh! Big stretch there. And besides, I told you that in the first place. All you had to do was ask.




But you making assumptions is what got us all into this mess in the first place.



AT NO POINT WHATSOEVER DID I EVER THREATEN TO "SHOOT" YOU OR IMPLY THAT YOU SHOULD BE SHOT.



I do not roll like that. Your allegations as such are innacurate, plain false and now you are slandering me. By accusing me of threats that I did not make, you are slandering me to people who do know who I am. Show me, or anyone else, where I ever threatened you. I did not make those statements and your assumption that I did is about to get you in a whole heap of trouble.



I want an apology, and not one of your half-assed ones you gave to Larry, or I will be consulting lawyers, because you are way off base and the "game" is over. And if you ever accuse me of such acts again without absolute proof, you will be in court faster than you can say "garbage preparation".



I called it an "alleged" threat because I did not physically see it. I am only going by what you have said, and I know by now that is not a reliable source. If it was actually a threat, I am sorry you recieved it, but I reserve judgement until I have proof...thats the silly thing about me and facts.



I have told you once and I will tell you again....I am NOT on the garbage committee (or the web committee either for that matter as you accused me of)....another assumption that makes you lose even more credibility, if you have any left.



The answer to your question about legal fees - When did I ever investigate, or mention, legal fees? I referred to a lawyer's letter, from 2007 that was mailed out to all 64 owners. I have never even once mentioned Legal Fees or your responsibilty (or lack thereof) for accruing them.



I mentioned you as the pot that called the kettle black because of your continued insisitence to delve into personal lives, while accusing others of doing the same when many would argue that they have the "mandate" to do so when it affects others, despite your opinion to the contrary. It is a matter of opinion. Your "investigations" or demands of peoples personal/business interests is not in any mandate you can justify.


You have been way off base in your assumptions. I did not say a word or ask a question at the AGM. In fact I wasn't even there. I never said I was. And how does my owning a dog or not have any relevance whatsoever to anything?



I did not threaten to "print them all up and dish them out door to door." The only thing I said was that if I didn't have a voice on your blog, "other steps might have to be taken to get the full and complete story out to the concerned stakeholders". The result is this blog.


Once again you accuse me of threatening you by starting my own blog? My god, ma'am, get real.


The difference between you and I is that while I form my opinion from the facts, you spin the facts to fit your opinion.

In the future, I would suggest you have proof, or at least solid evidence, because if you think Larry is gruff and out of line, wait until you put someone's family at risk with your assumptions and/or accusations. You ain't seen nothing yet.

I await your sincere apology and absolute retraction. No talk of "an odd series of coincidences" this time.

Coach14